Hello Derek,
>
> That's interesting about not seeing any interlacing artifacts in the
> compositor window. Two things might be making this happen. First,
> if
> you're not viewing the footage at 100% its original size (have the
> comp
> window zoomed out, that is), the scaling can slightly mute
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 19:52, Randolph wrote:
> I've been editing a video track in sync with an audio track as a guide.
> Subsequently, I've been disturbing the audio track by a fractions of a
> second here and there. It's little inconvenient to work with since I
> need to edit according to the o
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Randolph wrote:
> Is there a way to make an audio track independent from the time line, so
> video editing doesn't disturb it?
Editing only changes the armed tracks, so you can leave the audio alone by
just not arming the audio tracks. Try shift-click on the "arm" button for
I've been editing a video track in sync with an audio track as a guide.
Subsequently, I've been disturbing the audio track by a fractions of a
second here and there. It's little inconvenient to work with since I
need to edit according to the original audio track which gets too much
out of kil
ZF,
That's interesting about not seeing any interlacing artifacts in the
compositor window. Two things might be making this happen. First, if
you're not viewing the footage at 100% its original size (have the comp
window zoomed out, that is), the scaling can slightly mute the visible
interlacin
Hello Derek,
--- Derek McTavish Mounce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome to Cinelerra. :) It provides a fascinating and ultimately
> very
> productive way of working when you get used to its quirks, so stick
> with
> it!
Yes, it is a fascinating piece of art. I agree. I must confess that
I t
