The drawback of denoising a still images sequence is that you will denoise only
in the spatial domain, not temporal nor spatio-temporal (the latest being the
most effective for video -- motion compensated denoising).
- Mail Original -
De: E Chalaron e.chala...@xtra.co.nz
À:
Well ... not really Julien... or I don't think so. What is the difference
between scanned films (16mm for say) and progressive video frames ? apart from
the colour space of course...
Cheers
E
The drawback of denoising a still images sequence is that you will denoise only
in the spatial
My remark was not related to the progressive or interlaced nature of the frames
you want to process.
I just made the assumption (implicitly) that imagemagick would process those
still images (every TIFF file) independantly from the others. This tools is
meant for still image processing, not for
I think that using fixed parameters for the space-domain-only denoiser
reduces this problem related to flickering and so on.
Of couse a denoiser that is aware of temporal domain is better, no doubt.
Cheers,
rafael diniz
My remark was not related to the progressive or interlaced nature of the
My bad ... I was not thinkking of Imagemagick but denoisiners in general.
And to conclude ... I will denoise just before exporting to video ...
Cheers
E
--- On Sat, 9/4/11, julien.cyno...@free.fr julien.cyno...@free.fr wrote:
From: julien.cyno...@free.fr julien.cyno...@free.fr
Subject: Re:
