On 01/14/2014 08:01 AM, Haldun ALTAN wrote:
Hello Christian
I can also send 50 €. Just need information.
And thanks a lot for doing this.
Hope the project will live.
Haldun :))
You have to send your replies to the list, not just use reply-to
I forwarded this to the list.
Frans.
__
On 01/13/2014 10:28 PM, Christian Thaeter wrote:
Some time ago I've send the following text to the 'Transfering
cinerlerra.org' ML thread. But I guess no one noticed' i haven't gotten
any replys. While some people are now working out how to reactivate
'cinelerra.org' I'd like to remind that the s
Dear Reader,
I notice that the git has not been touched since September 24th, 2012.
Are there plans to move forward or is Cinelerra 4.4 so much better that
the CV version is not needed anymore?
regards, Frans.
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@sk
On 01/10/2012 07:17 PM, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Cinelerra.
I've read that the Community Version integrates the changes of the
Heroine Virtual version.
However considering the version numbers are quite different between both
version right now, does that still mean that CV 2.2. integr
On 11/20/2011 10:26 PM, feli wrote:
Le 2011-11-20 11:27, Heikki Repo a écrit :
2011/11/20 Leandro Martins:
Hi,
I would like to know where I could find information about people editing
feature films meant for theatrical release with Cinelerra.
I'm ready for a little sweat when it comes to figu
On 10/06/2011 11:41 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote:
Glen,
Please don't feel you're under any pressure, or attack. GPL issues are
far from being clear to everybody.
I'd just like to add that I have doubts you can re-license the GPL
components (which are essentially Debian, so GPL v2), into GPL v3.
C
On 07/27/2011 06:16 PM, LucaP70 wrote:
Ciao e scusate se vi disturbo.
Mi è stata segnalata la vostra mailing list dall'utente njin in seguito
ad un topic di assistenza aperto su www.ubuntu-it.org
da qui in giù i dettagli del problema:
http://forum.ubuntu-it.org/index.php/topic,472639.msg3699028.h
On 01/25/2011 12:28 AM, Gerrit de Jong wrote:
Hello
I want a low-budget desktop computer optimized for cinelerra. Say up
to 500 dollar. What should I buy? Do I need a fast graffic card or
should I better spend the money on a faster CPU? What CPU performs the
best for the money? If I need a gr
On 10/07/2010 03:36 PM, sfrase6 wrote:
> Maybe silly answer but... make sure you have libx264 and libx264-devel
>
>> installed.
>> Why don't you use the packages provided by your distro instead of
>> building the x264 git version?
>>
>>
> Frans,
> In my experience on both Ubuntu and Fedora
to function ‘x264_nal_encode’
>
> I don't know is there are x264 libraries bundled with cinelerra, but
> if it is the case, you can search for some configure option to use that.
>
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:32:21 +0200, Frans de Boer
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/07/2010 01
; make distclean
> first then
> ./configure --disable-mmx --enable-opengl
> then make
>
> However I have the same error on 11.2 64 bits and on a 11 64 bits.
> Meaning that I will soon update these boxes.
> Cheers
> E
>
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 7/10/10, Frans de Boer //*
Using OpenSuse 11.3 and the the .configure /without/ any options results in:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../libmpeg3 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DHAVE_MMX -DUSE_MMX
-DX86_CPU -DHAVE_FIREWIRE -I/u
Dear devs,
Cinelerra is not compiling anymore for the git repository. That is, the
new x264 is not eaten by cinelerra.
Message while compiling:
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../libmpeg3
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-DX86_CPU -DHAVE_FIREWIRE -
On 08/31/2010 03:49 AM, Bo Darble wrote:
>
>
> Frans de Boer wrote:
>> On 08/30/2010 11:12 PM, Frans de Boer wrote: The next error has
>> been reported long ago (> 1 year) and I remember that a patch was
>> proposed.
>> I can apply that patch again, but just w
On 08/30/2010 11:12 PM, Frans de Boer wrote:
> The next error has been reported long ago (> 1 year) and I remember
> that a patch was proposed.
> I can apply that patch again, but just wonder why this has not been
> fixed already. After all, the build-in FFMPEG library is quite old
The next error has been reported long ago (> 1 year) and I remember that
a patch was proposed.
I can apply that patch again, but just wonder why this has not been
fixed already. After all, the build-in FFMPEG library is quite old and
numerous errors and improvements have been published already.
Us
On 06/11/2010 10:08 PM, Adam B wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I tried Cinelerra for the first time last night. I was generally very
> impressed by it's speed and responsiveness. I'd like to use Cinelerra
> to create a video of my vacation but I seem to be limited by RAM. I
> have about 10.5GB of 720x48
On 04/06/2010 04:20 PM, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> Frans de Boer wrote:
>
>> On 04/06/2010 09:12 AM, Christian Thaeter wrote:
>>
>>> Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> I am usin
On 04/06/2010 09:12 AM, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> Frans de Boer wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I am using CV 2.1 and am still waiting for the CV 4.1 version.
>> As the developers have stated before - that the original authors where
>> interested in features,
Dear All,
I am using CV 2.1 and am still waiting for the CV 4.1 version.
As the developers have stated before - that the original authors where
interested in features, not stability and thus usability - I just wonder
why there is no CV 4.1 release yet. Is it because the original 4.1
release is so
Dear Reader,
Using the latest external libraries from git and svn of all the required
packages, I stumble on the next error:
qtffmpeg.c:228: error: ‘PIX_FMT_YUV422’ undeclared (first use in this
function)
If I compile cinelerra without the '--with-external-ffmpeg' switch, all
goes well. But then
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 00:45 +0300, phil hefferan wrote:
> "Armed" allows changes to a track, yes?
> One track must always be armed?
> If no track is armed, then no edits etc will be saved, even to the xml
> file?
> ie Changes are only written to the xml file for armed tracks.
> No actual changes ar
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 00:01 +0300, phil hefferan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Richard Rasker
> wrote:
>
> Hold down the Alt key, point your mouse somewhere in the
> window, and you
> can left-click & drag the window up. This way, you can move a
>
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 23:24 +0300, phil hefferan wrote:
> I cannot apply any Cinelerra settings->preferences changeson Ubuntu
> Hardy because the 'apply' button is hidden somewhere below the toolbar
> (if that is what it is called) along the bottom of the screen. The
> prefernces window opens tha
Hello Elisabeth,
The simple answer is just: yes.
Cinelerra is licensed under (L)GPL and is free of use. The license it
self deals with addition and/or modifications to the source code. In
fact, Cinelerra is already used by some of the big players to make, yes,
commercial grade clips.
Be advised
lt;= 0)
{
try++;
I hope someone can commit this into the mainstream branch. I still have
to figure out how git is exactly working :(
BTW: I used the latest FFmpeg r15444 and the latest git clone for x264.
Cinelerra and mplayer are now compiling "smoothly" and execute as
before.
Kind Regards,
Frans de Boer.
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 15:05 -0300, rafael2k wrote:
> Hello KH,
> OK, it's nice to ifdef things.
> I thing it's ok to use
> #if LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_INT < ((52<<16)+(0<<8)+0)
> for the code before the patch.
>
>
> bye,
> rafael diniz
>
>
> Em Saturday 27 September 2008, KH KH escreveu:
> > 2008/9/
clear notice - to be used with the
current SVN r1061? I know I will collect those functional sources to the
latest working versions and probably will offer them online in the near
future on my private server (no warranty about up-time).
Kind Regards,
Frans de Boer.
PS: cinelerra-4 is affected t
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:49 +0200, Simeon Völkel wrote:
> Hanno Böck wrote:
> > Is there any statement from HV if there'll be any back-merging?
> >
>
> HV stated quite clearly that they don't want to spent much bandwidth
> to do that, as they want to focus on their interests which shifted a
> bit
More or less, I am using SVN 1061 on Suse 11.0, however, I replaced some
libraries with newer ones. Sofar no strange problem encountered.
Frans
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:13 +1200, E Chalaron wrote:
> Hello there
> I was just wondering if the current svn has been tested on Suse 11
> Thanks
> E
>
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:52:41 +0200, Frans de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am using Cinelerra for a short time only and have used MainActor a
> > long time. Since that product is dead, I was looking for an alternative.
> >
the result as given in picture_2, Picture_3 has all the colors
(create with YUV4MPEG STREAM) but displays only lines.
I must do something wrong, but what?
KR, Frans de Boer.
Picture_1 Taken from the compositor window
http://www.fransdb.nl/public/good.png
Picture_2 Taken from Kaffeine
http
Cinelerra stable? That would be a first.
Although it is a powerful package, it is not for those who want also a
stable product. I even made a small script to clear temporary data and
restart Cinelerra as well as use the backup file to restore to the last
edit action. Simply because you need this ve
les.
That's it for today folks.
Frans de Boer.
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 09:04 +0200, Riviere Informatique SARL wrote:
> Where did you get the idea they try to offload the codebase?
> I tried to get in contact with them about that but they showed no
> interest at all.
> If you have a
provisions.
KR,
Frans de Boer.
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 03:06 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
> See my last mailing. Yes, I am new to this list. I was a MainActor adept
> and a Adobe Premiere (win32) before. Since MainActor has been killed
> off, I was looking for a viable successor. CV-Cinelerra see
.
Regards,
Frans de Boer.
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:18 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello dear reader,
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what this "lumiera" things is about? I have read many
> > reactions on all kinds of questions - including my own - which somehow
>
; CV-Cinelerra
(linux) - I do hope that the last transition was the last one for many
years to come. Those transitions meant doing it all over again.
Keep up the good work,
Frans de Boer.
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 02:27 +0200, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> Frans de Boer wrote:
> > Hello dear
Hello dear reader,
Can anyone tell me what this "lumiera" things is about? I have read many
reactions on all kinds of questions - including my own - which somehow
seem to be able to slip-in the word "lumiera". Please, humor me.
Re
Thanks Raffaella, until I buy a bigger screen, this is a workable
solution.
Regards,
Frans.
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:59 +0200, Raffaella Traniello wrote:
> Hi Frans!
>
> The best workaround I've found for this problem of screens smaller than
> the Preference Window is to move the window up when
yes, I am thinking of going to bigger screens, but for now it seems I
have to live with an uncomfortable 2048X1024 virtual screen instead of
just 2048x768. By the way, it seems that if I have a height of 800, the
buttons would show themselves. Any room for a fix?
Kind regards,
Frans de Boer.
On Fri,
Thanks, I can't see the bottom part of the Preference dialog, although I
use a screen height of 768. So when I use Cinelerra I must preset my
virtual screen to a height of 1024?
Are there short cut keys such as using Alt-A or the like?
Kind regards,
Frans de Boer.
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at
pointers?
Kind regards,
frans de Boer.
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
42 matches
Mail list logo
