A heated discussion can be beneficial--but please keep the tone friendly!
I've been following Cinelerra since the early days. By early I mean when
Adam Williams still granted interviews about Broadcast2000 and Michael
Collins started building turn-key systems through Linux Media Arts.
It wasn
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:09:27 +0200, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If for sure complaints are interesting when they contains details about
the version, and the way to reproduce the bug, I still have to
re-re-read Jordan's post to see any useful information...
His complaints were of the ve
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:47:45 +0200, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jordan's post isn't constructive at all. One could resume it with two
words: "cinelerra sucks".
Did he give examples of situations where cinelerra crashes? No.
It's just a succession of complains.
Did he give information abou
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:03:38PM +0200, Herman Robak wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:04:09 +0200, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hu!!! Nobody obliges you to use cinelerra.
>
> The 90s called and wanted that argument back.
>
> Nobody obliges me to use free software, either.
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> Jordan's post isn't constructive at all. One could resume it with two
> words: "cinelerra sucks".
He did give a very specific suggestion for how to improve Cinelerra to
address the problem he raised. The suggestion would be difficult to
implement, but the pos
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:04:09 +0200, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hu!!! Nobody obliges you to use cinelerra.
The 90s called and wanted that argument back.
Nobody obliges me to use free software, either. But I feel pretty
annoyed if I am forced to use payware. And for video ed
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:50:51PM +0300, Heikki Repo wrote:
>
> > Hu!!! Nobody obliges you to use cinelerra. If you think it
> > sucks, use something else and go complain somewhere else!
> >
> > Nicolas.
> >
>
> Now, I'm not either a developer, but somehow this sort of attitude
> alway
Exactly. I love cinelerra. It's a really awesome piece of software.
I really want to tell others about it, but I can't even take it
seriously yet because it seems so unstable. :(
- Jordan
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 17:50 +0300, Heikki Repo wrote:
> > Hu!!! Nobody obliges you to use cinelerra.
> Hu!!! Nobody obliges you to use cinelerra. If you think it
> sucks, use something else and go complain somewhere else!
>
> Nicolas.
>
Now, I'm not either a developer, but somehow this sort of attitude
always saddens me. As I see Jordan's comment, it isn't such some
complaint, but a ve
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:54:27AM -0400, Jordan Nash wrote:
> I'm just a user, not a developer, but it seems to me like cinelerra
> needs a good spring cleaning, at the least.
>
> As a user, I can't help but view cinelerra as a "You're lucky if you
> actually get it to work" type of application.
cinelerra needs to be redone, from
the very core. Make the very core of cinelerra stable, and add features
from there.
ok, using cinelerra to do editing is quite hardalthough i do that
(100% no: win no mac at all)...
..loosing lots of time, that's true, but i assume running
freeso
I'm just a user, not a developer, but it seems to me like cinelerra
needs a good spring cleaning, at the least.
As a user, I can't help but view cinelerra as a "You're lucky if you
actually get it to work" type of application. There are too many
unstable features, especially for a 2.* release. It
12 matches
Mail list logo
