Check sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.89 routes sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.89 advertised-routes
sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.93 routes sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.93 advertised-routes If results of both above commands same, then check for following statement in bgp configuration maximum-paths 2 If not check the following page, which will help you troubleshoot further. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/40.html Hope this helps, Thanks, Jana. -----Original Message----- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] Looks like you are definately receiving default from your providers. If I remember correctly though your big concern was incoming traffic not outgoing. Like I mentioned in my previous email you need to talk to your providers and find out how they are announcing your address space. For example if your provider A gave with a /26 subnet of a class C to use from their space provider B will not be able to propagate this. If provider A gave you a full class C but are announcing a supernet and provider B is annoucing the /24 porvider B will have the longest match. Dave "Jablonski, Michael" wrote: > > Same routes via both connections. this is our border router, no other > routing on the inside.. We're probably receiving default routes. > > BGP router identifier 65.196.X.X, local AS number 7046 > BGP table version is 3, main routing table version 3 > 2 network entries and 2 paths using 242 bytes of memory > 1 BGP path attribute entries using 92 bytes of memory > BGP activity 2/0 prefixes, 2/0 paths > > Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > State/PfxRcd > > 63.122.163.89 4 701 13251 13282 3 0 0 06:06:32 0 > 63.122.163.93 4 701 13251 13278 3 0 0 1w1d 0 > > I really apprecaite the help I'm getting from everyone! I only hope that I > get more exposure, to make studying for the CCNP worth it.... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] > > > Inbound/Outbound loads are out of wack.... what part of the > > BGP neigh stats > > do you want to see? > > I'm referring to simply 'sh ip bgp sum', as this will show the amount of > prefixes that you receive on each connection. So if I've read all of the > threads correctly, you have 2 T1's at 2 physically separate locations but > the same provider. I still have more questions than answers at this point. > Are you advertising any routes or the same routes via both connections? > (i.e. mail server, ftp server, dns server, etc...) Is there any routing > happening on the 'back side', in other words can one router choose to go to > the other router rather than out to the net? > > Looking at your stats from below, you don't have much traffic at all, in > either direction. Your loads are low and per packet count (on 5 min moving > average) is low. > > The questions about what routes you are receiving are relevant. Often you > have 3 or so options: > 1. Receive full-routes (100,000 plus routes) > 2. Receive partial routes (i.e. routes for customers that belong to same AS > that you get service from) > 3. Default route-only. > > Sorry if it seems I'm dragging you along, but there are several factors to > consider when you are attempting to get load-sharing. Especially if you are > connected to 2 separate routers on your provider's backbone. > > -chris > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be > privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender > by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any > unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part > is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to > change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be > responsible nor liable for the proper and complete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its > receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group > companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication > has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, > interceptions or interference. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42673&t=42469 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]