RE: 3550 and NAT, what are my options? [7:65052]

2003-03-11 Thread Charles Church
Either a device that supports NAT, or maybe some creative host routes and secondary addresses on the inside device? Chuck Church CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE Wam!Net Government Services 13600 EDS Dr. Herndon, VA 20171 cell 585-233-2706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Problem with Cicso VPN Client 3.6.3.B-k9 connecting to a [7:65311]

2003-03-13 Thread Charles Church
Sounds like you're not allowing split tunnel on the Pix. With out split tunnel, the client defaults to encrypting all packets and forwarding them to the PIX, even if the destination is on the local segment. Chuck Church CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE Wam!Net Government Services 13600 EDS Dr. Herndon, VA

OT: CCIEs with current or previous security clearance required [7:73737]

2003-08-10 Thread Charles Church
All, Sorry about the OT, but if you or someone you know has both their CCIE and a current or expired US govt. security clearance (secret or higher), my company has an immediate need. There are also many other jobs, not requiring a CCIE, but all need the secret or higher clearance. Here's

RE: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface B [7:73738]

2003-08-14 Thread Charles Church
Check out: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml Everything you need to know about it on one page. It lists the versions vulnerable and what version for the same train that it's fixed in. If you stay in the same train (12.1.5 and 12.1.19 are the same train, as are