Either a device that supports NAT, or maybe some creative host routes and
secondary addresses on the inside device?
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services
13600 EDS Dr.
Herndon, VA 20171
cell 585-233-2706
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sounds like you're not allowing split tunnel on the Pix. With out split
tunnel, the client defaults to encrypting all packets and forwarding them to
the PIX, even if the destination is on the local segment.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services
13600 EDS Dr.
Herndon, VA
All,
Sorry about the OT, but if you or someone you know has both their CCIE and
a current or expired US govt. security clearance (secret or higher), my
company has an immediate need. There are also many other jobs, not
requiring a CCIE, but all need the secret or higher clearance. Here's
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml
Everything you need to know about it on one page. It lists the versions
vulnerable and what version for the same train that it's fixed in. If you
stay in the same train (12.1.5 and 12.1.19 are the same train, as are
4 matches
Mail list logo