Hi All, 

My question(s) mostly concern the type 3 (network summary) LSA's. The way I
understand it, is that a type 3 could contain an LSA from
three sources:

(1) Default route - resulting from my coding area as STUB. 

(2) Summarized address range - resulting from my manual coding an AREA
RANGE. 

(3) A singe, explicit LSA - resulting from me doing neither of the two
above. 

This last one creates my question(s). If that is correct, then there are a
couple of statements about OSPF workings that don't seem to fit. 

(1) Even though the type 1 or 2 LSA is not (in that format) flooded outside
the area, it ESSCENTIALLY is by simply being re-sent as a type 3 (ie: same
info and effect, different packaging)? (The statement is made that "type 1
and 2 are not flooded outside area").

(2) That also means that a change in that single link state WOULD cause a
change to be propagated into the other area? 
Statement is made that "a change in one area is not reflected into another".
(I'm assuming that all links in a summarized LSA would have to go down
before THAT would cause change.) 

(3) How would this save any resources or be any different than if it were
sent through as a type 1/2? Does that Inter-Area network/link appear to the
other-area routers as being directly connected to the ABR and they therefore
don't have to run SPF for it, just add cost to ABR?

The realization I came to(with this in mind) was that OSPF is designed with
summarization etc. in mind, but it's really up to you to manually design the
ip addr space and code the summarization to make it work in it's documented
fashion? Is this an accuarate statement?

THanks for any feedback/opinions. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This communication (including all attachments) is intended solely for the
use of the person or persons to whom it is addressed and should be treated
as a  confidential xwave communication.  If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, distribution, printing, or copying of this email is
strictly prohibited.  If you received this email in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the originator.  Your
cooperation is appreciated.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5465&t=5465
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to