Folks
 
       Actually you need what is termed a conditioning cable to enable
LX to run over MM; I think PN CAB-GELX-625=. Works fine. Reference 
 
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/534/21.html
 
cheers
ejc

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Wed 4/4/2001 6:57 AM 
        To: Mohamed Heeba 
        Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Subject: Re: Gigabit ethernet distance limitation (off topic )
        
        

        Nope.  I just tried this yesterday with a 4006 and a 6509 and no
go.  The
        Cisco reseller information states it will work with MM fiber,
but the GBIC
        itself actually says 1300nm fiber (SM).  Here is a URL that has
the info
        you are looking for. (See the bottom of the chart)  This URL
makes it seem
        like there are two LX/LH GBICs available, but I only have a part
number
        for one.
        
        
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/prodlit/c60ge_ds.h
tm
        
        HTH!
        
        Ron Fuller, CCIE #5851, CCDP, CCNP-ATM, CCNP-Security,
CCNP-Voice, MCNE
        3X Corporation
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        
        
        Mohamed Heeba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        04/04/2001 06:30 AM
        Please respond to Mohamed Heeba
        
        
                To:     "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                cc:     "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                Subject:        Gigabit ethernet distance limitation
(off topic )
        
        
        hi guys
        anyone know if the LX modules can run over MM fiber ?
        where can i get the distance limitation for this
        
        
        thx
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of 
winmail.dat]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to