Traceroute troubles [7:61247]---------- Thank You. [7:62023]

be. The only real difference is that when the message reaches the final destination, the destination normally responds to the ping, rather than sending a port unreachable message." Hope that helps!? ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.prisci

RE: Traceroute troubles [7:61247]

Guys, Have anybody figured this out.I seem to go nowhere thinking about this.. Your help appreciated as i am loosing sleep. Thanks -Original Message- From: Kumar, N K. Satish, NSPM Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Traceroute

RE: Traceroute troubles [7:61247]

I agree this works, but still that doesn;t answers one thingCisco and unix boxes where this * trouble is seen doesn;t use ICMP but uses UDP port for the trace output then howcome this is the fix ! Thanks -Original Message- From: William Pearch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Console speed [7:36155]

Confreg in ROMMON with a bootloader of 12.0 XE the highest speed you can go is only 9600!!! Thats my whole problem. > -Original Message- > From: Ranma [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Console speed [7

ARP Cache [7:12270]

Hi Everybody, I ran into a weird trouble the yesterday.. I am having a Cisco 3600 router with some 16 Class-C connected to the Fast Ethernet as secondary addresses. My host were not able to ping the router across the ethernet at all... I was seeing the ARP entry of my host on the router but not