Re: Bad mask /24 for address ???? [7:73801]

Hy Iwan, Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 you need the command : ip subnet-zero on your router here. Regards, Marco [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73803t=73801

Re: Bad mask /24 for address ???? [7:73801]

Hy Iwan, Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 you need the command : ip subnet-zero on your router here. Regards, Marco [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ,

Re: Bad mask /24 for address ???? [7:73801]

Hy Iwan, Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 you need the command : ip subnet-zero on your router here. Regards, Marco [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ,

Re: 6509 MSFC [7:71340]

Hy, but uses a system default Loopback address (127.0.0.x). When I session over, it shows that I came from 127.0.0.y. Any thoughts...? you are right :-) It does use a telnet-session. If you use an ACL on your vty's, you can include/exclude the 127.0.0.x range to allow / reject

CCIP 640-910 MPLS [7:60977]

hy all, is anyone here, who passed the 640-910 exam? i took it and failed by 5 points *argl*. i think that i misinterpret the ospf exhibitions ( the drawings aren't really good). any suggestions? kind regards, marco [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]