Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add & two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: > Hey there, Tom: > > You don't need to do this with BGP (since you'r

Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add & two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: > Hey there, Tom: > > You don't need to do this with BGP (since you'r

Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add & two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: > Hey there, Tom: > > You don't need to do this with BGP (since you'r

Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add & two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: > Hey there, Tom: > > You don't need to do this with BGP (since you'r