Re: PIX 520 ethernet cards

2000-12-01 Thread Patrick W. Bass
Do so at your own peril. ""Frank Wells"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey Folks, > Can I put a non-Cisco ethernet card (Intel/3com) in my PIX 520 as a third > interface, and if so, how does one load the driver for it? I assume the > driver f

Re: Router gets stuck

2000-12-01 Thread Patrick W. Bass
Apply some type of lubircant to your serial interface connector. I'd suggest non-stick PAM or something similar. This will keep your router from getting stuck. "Barbara Cobbina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, After fiddling around with

Re: Groupstudy server issues???

2000-12-01 Thread Patrick W. Bass
"Even if I knew I had only 1 more week to live, I would still schedule my CCIE lab. I would just have to work a little harder I guess. After all, without any goals in life, I'm dead already."   ~Mark Zabludovsky~   "That's pathetic"  ~Patrick Bas

Re: PIX problem?

2000-12-04 Thread Patrick W. Bass
you need to set your telnet command telnet ip_address [netmask] [if_name] ip_address = a host or network that can access the PIX firewall telnet console. Default is internal interface. "Dinesh B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi.. > > I am

Re: 7200 router question [7:16100]

2001-08-18 Thread Patrick W. Bass
remove and reinsert it while the router is powered up. ""Cooper, David"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What version of IOS? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:ICPPhila_Email_Re [EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001

home lab equipment [7:26555]

2001-11-16 Thread Patrick W. Bass
Can anyone comment on this list of equipment? I'm fortunate enough to have this equipment as a home lab. I'm going to use it for CCIE Security lab study. 1 AGS+ running 11.0(16) -14 ethernet interfaces -2 serial interfaces 1 Cat 5000 - Sup III - C5RSM - 24Port ethernet 1 Pix 520 - 3 fast

Re: Broadband and Internet Lease LIne [7:26697]

2001-11-19 Thread Patrick W. Bass
What type of equipment do you have to play with to make this happen? ""William"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can I use broadband for web browse only and internet lease line for > email traffic only? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/rea

Re: Catalyst 3900 [7:27131]

2001-11-22 Thread Patrick W. Bass
for that matter, would a cat 2600 work? wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can someone who's taken the lab confirm if they got a Catalyst 3900 ? > > Did you get a model 3900 or a 3920 ? > > Also, could you use a T/R module in the Catalyst 5000 to do the same thing >

Re: tacacs+ and pix [7:27141]

2001-11-22 Thread Patrick W. Bass
there is only privileged and unprivileged mode. no levels. ""ipguru1"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I tried looking this up but all I find is how to setup tacacs+ on the > pix. I would like to have priv. levels on the pix? Is this possible? > > thanks > bk

Re: 864 for BCRAN today [7:27121]

2001-11-22 Thread Patrick W. Bass
Wow that's juicy information. Doesn't that break the NDA you agreed to? ""Chris Welsh"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > OK - firstly thanks for the tips I read on this board - study X.25 ISDN and > don't worry too much about the 700 series router. > > One of the

Re: Terminal Server with SSH - Not cheap are they? [7:27038]

2001-11-22 Thread Patrick W. Bass
No, not really... here's why: you're connection to the jump-point (your linux box) is via SSH. you're connection to the router is via telnet configure the router to *only* accept telnet sessions from the linux box So, in theory someone could sniff the network and get your login authentication

Re: PIX conduit & access lists [7:26684]

2001-11-25 Thread Patrick W. Bass
""Allen May"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm not sure if this was answered or not, but a firewall always assumes a > deny all at the end of the access-list for inbound. Outbound is different > since it allows all by default. > Remeber this: Higher security level to lower secu