RE: OSPF through PIX [7:72938]

2003-07-24 Thread Robertson, Douglas
OSPF through a PIX firewall is not supported. There are two ways to configure routing through a PIX. 1) Configure a GRE tunnel between the two routers. 2) Configure BGP between the two routers. The two choices have different implications depending on your specific network. Thanks Doug -Origi

RE: a really big bug [7:72463]

2003-07-18 Thread Robertson, Douglas
I would like the opinion of the group as to what they are suggesting to customers or doing on there own network. I am of the opinion that as long as the network (Intranet) has been correctly protected, firewalls/ACL on the perimeter and that the internal network device IP's are not accessible from

RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]

2003-06-11 Thread Robertson, Douglas
This has been an entertaining thread, but the way I see it is this. Maybe the high/low CCIE would work with the headhunters and that is a different story, but we have interviewed/employed a number of IT guys over the past couple of months, CCIE's included and to be honest I do not look to the CCIE

LS1010 ASP card error [7:62985]

2003-02-13 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Has anyone seen this error on an LS1010 ASP IOS version 11.2(10)WA3(4) Dec 9 19:22:18 _5500C_SWITCH 38: Dec 9 19:13:36: %SCHED-3-THRASHING: Process thrashing on watched queue 'lec_flush_inputQ' (count 6). Dec 9 19:22:18 _5500C_SWITCH 39: -Process= "LANE Client", ipl= 6, pid= 56 Dec 9 1

RE: must I have aaa server to configure SSH on PIX? [7:62008]

2003-01-28 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Configure the aaa, but use local login. You do need the aaa configuration for SSH to work. Doug -Original Message- From: Richard Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: must I have aaa server to configure SSH on PIX? [7:6

RE: IPSec on IP unnumbered with 3DES [7:49113]

2002-07-18 Thread Robertson, Douglas
This will work, we have many routers configured with the serial link (going to ISP) as ip unnumbered ethernet 0/0. The only additional command you will need is "crypto map rtp local-address FastEthernet0/0" Doug -Original Message- From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Robertson, Douglas
. Unless you are using secondary addresses and not subinterfaces. Doug -Original Message- From: Ciaron Gogarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:18 AM To: Robertson, Douglas; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] Hi Richard, The simple

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Robertson, Douglas
I am not sure I would class a PIX as a router in the true sense of the word, yes it does route traffic from interface to interface but would I use it as a router, NO, it only supports ONE routing protocol RIP, that does not constitute a good router in my eyes. Now to the question, just reading t

RE: Cisco VPN client and NAT [7:47430]

2002-06-26 Thread Robertson, Douglas
In most cases the PIX does not support VPN's over PAT you need a static NAT to establish a VPN tunnel. Protocol 50 (Encapsulating Security Payload [ESP]) handles the encrypted/encapsulated packets of IPSec. PAT devices don't work with ESP since they have been programmed to work only with Transmiss

RE: Let the flamin' begin....dumbass beginner question [7:43773]

2002-05-09 Thread Robertson, Douglas
On the DCE cable side ( use show controller serial X to determine DTE or DCE cable ) you will need the following command: in interface configuration test#(config-if)clock rate ( use help to find the different clock rates ) Doug -Original Message- From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: Controlling utilization on switch port [7:39038]

2002-03-21 Thread Robertson, Douglas
You could use a feature called storm control, I have not actually used this to control Unicast utilization ( mostly use this feature for Broadcast control) however the principle would be the same for multicast and Unicast traffic. Storm control is enabled, the switch monitors packets passing from

RE: Where to find "Protocol Type Code" in Cisco CD ? [7:38763]

2002-03-19 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Try this link http://www.iana.org/assignments/ethernet-numbers Doug -Original Message- From: Ruen-Chze Loh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Where to find "Protocol Type Code" in Cisco CD ? [7:38763] > Hi, > > I tried sea

RE: CCIE security [7:36860]

2002-03-11 Thread Robertson, Douglas
You can join the Security Forum at www.securityie.com Doug -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE security [7:36860] anybody working on CCIE Sec ? Let me know. -Origin

RE: software upgrade for Cat5505 switch for each module? [7:37392]

2002-03-06 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Review the following document on CCO, http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/c5krn/sw_rns/78_ 6583.htm#xtocid3 the document indicates the upgrade path for Catalyst 5000 switches, it also has a table that shows which versions of CAT OS is supported by each module. Depending on

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-16 Thread Robertson, Douglas
ns. > >-Original Message- >From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058] > > >I don't know about a hard limit but me thinks you'll hit the practi

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-16 Thread Robertson, Douglas
an acedemic question??? Dave "Robertson, Douglas" wrote: > > Does anyone know of limitation in the amount of EIGRP neighbors on a router. > If there is, is this a limitation per physical interface or a limitation > per router. I found a document on CCO a couple of months ago th

EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-15 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Does anyone know of limitation in the amount of EIGRP neighbors on a router. If there is, is this a limitation per physical interface or a limitation per router. I found a document on CCO a couple of months ago that mentioned these limits but I have now searched and searched but cannot find that

RE: Cisco TACACS+ Problem [7:26783]

2001-11-20 Thread Robertson, Douglas
The best way to troubleshoot the problem would be to enable debugging on the Tacacs server, The following commands assume you have a Unix Tacacs server and you will need root access. The first file you need to edit is the $BASEDIR/config/CSU.cfg file. You will need to change the following lines

RE: Pix Firewall [7:21924]

2001-10-03 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Cisco have two CBT's in the Learning Store that you can purchase, I think they cost around $550-00 for the two. I am just starting to review them now so I can not say how good they are, but I got the recommendations from this list some time ago. Log on to Cisco CCO then go to certifications, then

RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10816]

2001-07-03 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Remember the AGS has jumper settings on the appliqui to determine if the interface is DCE or DTE, have you checked that they are set correctly for your configuration. Check out http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cisagspl/agscfig/34084. htm#xtocid2857013 for serial port communic

RE: certificate [7:5200]

2001-05-21 Thread Robertson, Douglas
I am not so sure that this " flame " was appropriate, it was a simple question, if you do not think this subject is for the Cisco groupstudy list why not just move on to the next mail and forget it. Anyway I didn't see you flaming the Juniper questions, what do they have to do with the Cisco Group