> My company's Facilities department manager mentioned in meeting that
> he was having someone cable our entire building to support a new
> fire/emergency alarm system, and I was just thinking that... hey...
> the whole place is already networked. Isn't there some kind of
> Ethernet-aware alarm or
> My company's Facilities department manager mentioned in meeting that
> he was having someone cable our entire building to support a new
> fire/emergency alarm system, and I was just thinking that... hey...
> the whole place is already networked. Isn't there some kind of
> Ethernet-aware alarm or
Two other problems with Cisco beta exams is that they are often loaded
with errors (meaning you can get an answer right, but not get the
points), and that you don't learn the results for months. In your case,
you'd spend two months not knowing if you're CCNP is valid (I couldn't
handle the pressur
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Weaselboy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: wireless [7:71781]
>
>
> I passed both the SE and FE exams first time out using the CWNA book and
> bosons. Between t
I needed to pad out my resume with a few good certs before I renew my
CCNP and start the CCIE track. Wireless is a hot topic, and these were
two pretty easy one-test resume fillers (and kinda fun to play with).
SE = (wireless) System Engineer
FE = (wireless) Field Engineer
Here are links to th
iginal Message-
> From: Weaselboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: Catherine Wu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: wireless [7:71781]
>
>
> I had a little bit of practical experience with other manufacture's
> equipme
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Weaselboy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: wireless [7:71781]
>
>
> I passed both the SE and FE exams first time out using the CWNA book and
> bosons. Between t
I passed both the SE and FE exams first time out using the CWNA book and
bosons. Between these two sources you should have everything you need.
Take the SE first (its a little easier).
The WB
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 09:23, Vijay Anand wrote:
> hello all
>
> i want to know ,,how is Cisco wirele
I passed both the Wireless SE and FE exams using the CWNA book and the
bosons. The two exams have about 70% overlap, I'd go ahead and take them
both to double certify. Since the SE is easier, I'd do that one first.
Just my $.02
The WB
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 11:03, Joao Medeiros wrote:
> with cc
I'm really worried about these three topics - is there anybody out there
who has some idea of how deep they cover these, and maybe some good
links?
Thanks in advance for any help
WB
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 16:31, Weaselboy wrote:
> I'm trying to get ready to take the new BCRAN when
I'm trying to get ready to take the new BCRAN when it comes out, but all
the study guides are focused on the old exam. For those who took the
beta, can you give me any guidance on these three topics - VPN, QoS and
Traffic Shaping. I'm not looking for anybody to break the NDA, I just
want to know h
I took the new switching beta this weekend (I'll find out if I passed
sometime in the future). Since I passed the old version, I figured I'm
qualified to make a comparison.
The old exam was ridiculously heavy with type-in-the-command type
questions - a pure memorization-fest. The new one is mu
ark and see possibilities?) Way to go Cisco. That's a good
change,
> considering the fact that "real network engineers" depend on the question
> mark. :-)
>
> Priscilla
>
> Weaselboy wrote:
> >
> > I took the new switching beta this weekend (I'll find out
Every job I've ever had has been that way! Of course you don't know it
now, but spend whatever time is necessary to get yourself there as
quickly as possible, and you'll be fine.
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 00:52, B Rudy wrote:
> Hey guys, I just got an offer to become a 2nd senior network engine
I believe there was an extensive conversation within the group in the
last few months that the difference wasn't so much with what topics
being covered, but rather that the level of difficulty was ratcheted up.
Priscilla was a major contributer to the conversation, so you know it
will have signific
Thank you Dave and Kok - I appreciate your letting me know...
On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 19:29, Dave Jacoby wrote:
> Me neither.
>
> Dave
>
> ""Kok Onn Lim"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > You can forget about the two topic. I've done the exam, but didn't face
> any
> > question on
16 matches
Mail list logo
