t. ( 172.16.16.0/20 and
> 172.16.32.0/20 )
> therefore,
> the router will apply a MATCH and deal to those packets as appropriate.
>
> for A, 172.16.1.1 is not in the 172.16.16.0/20 or 172.16.32.0/20 networks
> therefore,
> there is NO MATCH in the access-list statement
> so no ac
because the 172.16.1.1 address is not included in your access-list
> statement.
>
> the addresses that would be affected are 172.16.16.0/20 to 172.16.32.0/20
> and 172.16.1.1/20 is in another network
>
> R,
> MariaD
>
>
> ""lishengtao"" <[EM
The following is an access-list entered on a Cisco router: access-list 135
deny tcp 172.16.16.0 0.0.15.255 172.16.32.0 0.0.15.255 eq telnet access-list
135 permit ip any any br>Which of the following would not apply if this
access-list is used to control incoming packets on ethernet 0?
A. addres
The following is an access-list entered on a Cisco router: access-list 135
deny tcp 172.16.16.0 0.0.15.255 172.16.32.0 0.0.15.255 eq telnet access-list
135 permit ip any any br>Which of the following would not apply if this
access-list is used to control incoming packets on ethernet 0?
A. addre
4 matches
Mail list logo