Re: 3500xl [7:31149]

yes, on the vty lines to restrict telnet access to the switch. ms --- James, Eric L. wrote: Anyone ever setup access-lists on a 3500 switch? thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!

Re: Aeropoint - Cisco CSS 11000 Content switch [7:30711]

F5 is not a bad box...I can admit that. But I still think that alteon outperforms it. see attached PDF: just my opinion, ms --- Scott M. Trieste wrote: Brant, Great call on the BigIP. I am a huge fan of F5's product line, and there BigIP -HA box is sooo sweet. If anyone would

Re: OT - Firewall performance Comparisons - is it quitting time [7:30862]

own at 300+ mbs of web traffic. - the closer you get to 400mbs..the scarier it gets. hope this helps, ms ms --- Liz wrote: I would like to know about the 535's also curious if you have worked with the 525's at all. We just got two to replace some old 510's. Thanks, Liz matt shiite

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

Are these routers directly connected? If so, that explains why you would still be able to ping. Did you try to use loopback interfaces and see if those routes are being announced? ms --- CCIEn2002 wrote: Thank you for the info. Now I am a little confused still on the passive interface. If

Re: SSL Accelerators [7:30724]

Personnally I have used the Alteon series loadbalancers with their ISD ssl accelerator. I can't complain...they have worked like a champ. Just another option for ya :) ms --- Gaz wrote: Not providing many/any answers here I'm afraid - just asking more questions. Is SSL that suitable for

Re: OT - Firewall performance Comparisons - is it quitting time [7:30590]

I don't know too much about the Nokia boxes, but have done quite a bit of work on Pix's. I witnessed the 515 fail at between 20-30 mbs (a documented bug). I found that to be very lame. Also, did quite a bit of testing with cisco on the PIX 535. If anyone cares to see when that thing