Re: RIP w/ key-chains [7:46671]

2002-06-14 Thread Nick Shah
Tim, Very interesting Q. However, one thing, *key Chain* names are only locally significant (on the router on which its defined). *key string* should be same for pair of routers (or adjacent routers which are going to exchange updates). I have checked it at various sources, DOC CD under IP

Re: RIP w/ key-chains [7:46675]

2002-06-14 Thread Nick Shah
work. So what you are saying is correct regarding key-id's. The ip rip authentication key test 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 seems a peculiar behaviour... I guess this is one more thing that we need to lab up and check. rgds Nick - Original Message - From: Timothy Ouellette To: Nick Shah Cc

Re : Configuration Register Question [7:30715]

2002-01-02 Thread nick shah
check this url out.. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis4000/4000m/4000sig/vconfig.htm#41058 It has some good info on standard and so called non-std. config. register info. hth Nick _ Get your

RE: The old how to get routes into IGRP qu [7:29021]

2001-12-14 Thread nick shah
the rule of thumb is do what they say, but if something is not expressly forbidden, it is fair game. True.. the idea that some successful Lab takers all tend to agree on, is that going into the Lab you want to have a lot of tools at your disposal. So you can filter redistribution using route