It occurs to me that I do not understand how IGRP unequal load balancing
works.
Yes, I understand what the commands are, and I am well aware of the
intricacies involved in fast-switching and CEF. So please don't respond by
telling me to configure 'variance' or stuff like that. I already know all
the route is rejected
unconditionally for unequal balancing. This would be something similar to
what the whole EIGRP successor algorithm accomplishes. Does anybody know
for a fact whether this is in the IGRP algorithm?
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news
""Jay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> OK, OK, well what about my question then? Is there any way to do this?
Yes - UTI
>
> > >this: (which you can't do)
> > >
> > >int tunnel0
> > > tun sour 10.10.10.1
> > > tun dest 10.20.20.1
> > > bridge-group 1
> > >
>
If this is true then it represents an even worse devaluation of the CCIE
than what has happened already. Not only will there be those lab-rat CCIE's
out there with zero experience that are being churned out already, but now
Cisco itself will be pumping out CCIE's with as little as 3 months
experi
4 matches
Mail list logo