so how does IGRP unequal load-balancing work anyway? [7:66665]

2003-04-02 Thread nwo
It occurs to me that I do not understand how IGRP unequal load balancing works. Yes, I understand what the commands are, and I am well aware of the intricacies involved in fast-switching and CEF. So please don't respond by telling me to configure 'variance' or stuff like that. I already know all

Re: so how does IGRP unequal load-balancing work anywa [7:66727]

2003-04-02 Thread nwo
the route is rejected unconditionally for unequal balancing. This would be something similar to what the whole EIGRP successor algorithm accomplishes. Does anybody know for a fact whether this is in the IGRP algorithm? ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message news

Re: netbios over internet [7:40784]

2002-04-08 Thread nwo
""Jay"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > OK, OK, well what about my question then? Is there any way to do this? Yes - UTI > > > >this: (which you can't do) > > > > > >int tunnel0 > > > tun sour 10.10.10.1 > > > tun dest 10.20.20.1 > > > bridge-group 1 > > > >

Re: CCIE in 3-6 Months from cisco Interesting [7:43306]

2002-05-04 Thread nwo
If this is true then it represents an even worse devaluation of the CCIE than what has happened already. Not only will there be those lab-rat CCIE's out there with zero experience that are being churned out already, but now Cisco itself will be pumping out CCIE's with as little as 3 months experi