Re: "no weighted fair-queue" ?

2000-08-10 Thread ivan centeno
lso try a command like this: priority-list 1 protocol ip high >tcp telnet > >Dave > >-Original Message- >From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 1:15 PM >To: 'Phil Barker'; cisco GroupStudy >Subject: RE: "no w

RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ?

2000-08-10 Thread Aaron K. Dixon
August 10, 2000 11:17 AM To: cisco GroupStudy Subject: "no weighted fair-queue" ? Hi gang, I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to FIFO which I could do without, for obvious reasons. i.e I need a good telnet response.

RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ?

2000-08-10 Thread David Jones
You might also try a command like this: priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp telnet Dave -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 1:15 PM To: 'Phil Barker'; cisco GroupStudy Subject: RE: "no weighted fair-queue

RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ?

2000-08-10 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:17 AM To: cisco GroupStudy Subject: "no weighted fair-queue" ? Hi gang, I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to FIFO which I could do witho

"no weighted fair-queue" ?

2000-08-10 Thread Phil Barker
Hi gang, I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to FIFO which I could do without, for obvious reasons. i.e I need a good telnet response. Has anyone heard of a BUG in 11.2 series IOS in WFQ whereby switching it off was a bett