A central site has two T1s to 2 different providers. Which routing
protocols
iis required in this case? Can I load balance between these T1s?
regards,
dj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7835&t=7835
--
FAQ, lis
providers? Can I load balance? [7:7835]
A central site has two T1s to 2 different providers. Which routing
protocols
iis required in this case? Can I load balance between these T1s?
regards,
dj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7842&am
As is quite common, in this situation we must apply The Berkowitz
Interrogative: What problem are you trying to solve?
Do you want a second T-1 because of traffic requirements? Are you running
low on available bandwidth as it is? Are you worried that this might happen
at some point in the near
"John Neiberger" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If you connect to two separate providers this opens a much larger can of
> worms. You're going to need to apply for your own Autonomous System
number
> from ARIN (www.arin.net).
Is it possible to coordinate with th
and work out
the
> routing policies between you and the 2 providers.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitrije [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 12:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 2 T1s to different providers? Ca
| "John Neiberger" wrote in message
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| > If you connect to two separate providers this opens a much larger can
of
| > worms. You're going to need to apply for your own Autonomous System
| number
| > from ARIN (www.arin.net).
|
| Is it possib
John,
Do you know anything about the Radware linkproof unit that you mentioned
earlier?
I read the gumpf, but I also read that there wasn't anyone around that had
actually implemented this.
Any ideas, experience with this unit?
Rashid Lohiya
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
020 8509 2990
07785 362626
www.pion
Re the below, if you decide after some consideration that you want
different links from different isps, by default if you tell them you're
going to do that, you should be able to get at least a /24. If you cannot
get that after telling them you're multihoming, cross em off your list.
Bri
I haven't had any experience with it yet but we've had salesmen from Fatpipe
and Radware in for meetings and we decided to go with Radware. We will be
implementing it sometime in the next six months and I'll be sure to post our
results to the list.
John
| John,
|
| Do you know anything abou
With our providers, when we request new addresses we have to be able to
justify them. By that I mean they want to see that we will actually be
using 80% of the assigned addresses within three months. In the case of a
company wanting to multihome some web servers, chances are that they're
really
If you have less than a /24 and you are going to do bgp with multiple
providers, it is a borderline waste of time. I agree that if you are
singlehomed, or are multihomed and already have a /24, getting additional
ips is work, reason being is because the providers have to justify it to
Arin.
I'll
11 matches
Mail list logo
