Re: 3des encryption -- darn! repost [7:11490]

2001-07-10 Thread Dennis H
3DES than on (ordinary) DES. > > > Matthew > > -Original Message- > From: Dennis H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 3des encryption -- darn! repost [7:11490] > > > What do you mean by pa

RE: 3des encryption -- darn! repost [7:11490]

2001-07-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
intensive on a PIX using 3DES than on (ordinary) DES. Matthew -Original Message- From: Dennis H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3des encryption -- darn! repost [7:11490] What do you mean by payload? I assume you mean

Re: 3des encryption -- darn! repost [7:11490]

2001-07-09 Thread Dennis H
What do you mean by payload? I assume you mean packet size. I don't have the exact figures but I the overhead on packet size is about 10%. The overhead on the CPU utilization could be 100%, which might be what he is thinking of. Dennis wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry for