Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: Hey there, Tom: You don't need to do this with BGP (since you're not multi-homed). You can

Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: Hey there, Tom: You don't need to do this with BGP (since you're not multi-homed). You can

Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: Hey there, Tom: You don't need to do this with BGP (since you're not multi-homed). You can

Re: BGP [7:16438]

Or you can achieve equal cost load balancing giving two static routes with same cost. If you want you can have BGP also with loopback add two routes to reach them. Regards Omkar Mark Morenz wrote: Hey there, Tom: You don't need to do this with BGP (since you're not multi-homed). You can

RE: BGP [7:16438]

Hey there, Tom: You don't need to do this with BGP (since you're not multi-homed). You can just use static routes and set the metrics so that when one fails, the other picks it up. :-{)] Mark A. Morenz, MS Ed, CCNA, CCAI Message Posted at:

BGP [7:16438]

Does anyone have a configuration where your site has two Internet connections (thus 2 Internet routers via separate circuits) that connect to the same ISP. Furthermore you are given two class C networks to use. I'm looking into a BGP configuration where I can provide redundancy via the