Is it required in eBGP that the two routers should be directly connected
(physically) or can be logically connected directly.
Stanzin Takpa
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38877&t=38877
--
FAQ, list archives,
This is the most common but not required. If you do not use the directly
connected
interfaces you will need to use the "update source x" and "ebgp multihop"
commands.
Dave
Stanzin Takpa wrote:
> Is it required in eBGP that the two routers should be directly connected
> (physically) or can
: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP Issue... [7:38877]
Is it required in eBGP that the two routers should be directly connected
(physically) or can be logically connected directly.
Stanzin Takpa
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&a
PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP Issue... [7:38877]
Is it required in eBGP that the two routers should be directly connected
(physically) or can be logically connected directly.
Stanzin Takpa
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38886&
You could use logical connection but in your BGP
statement you need to put in EBGP multi-hop and of
course update source need to be defined as well
hope it helps !!
suaveguru
--- Stanzin Takpa wrote:
> Is it required in eBGP that the two routers should
> be directly connected
> (physically) or
And it must be "REACHABLE". :-)
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is the most common but not required. If you do not use the directly
> connected
> interfaces you will need to use the "update source x" and "ebgp multihop"
> commands.
>
> Dave
>
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BGP Issue... [7:38877]
No need at all.
Make a neighbor statement with the remote-as then add another neighbor
statement like this:
Neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/13.html#A5.0
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Stanzin
Ladrach
> CCNA, CCNP
> WorldCom
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roberts, Larry
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: BGP Issue... [7:38877]
>
>
> No need at all.
>
&
8 matches
Mail list logo