-map
> feature?
>
> ( quick look in the book - yes, there it is, page 354 )
>
> Chuck
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Daniel Ji
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 12:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Daniel Ji
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP question - Multihoming
ask your provider1 NOT to aggregate your /23 block, instead advertise it
alone, AND put more AS
o not advertise anything longer than a /19
or so.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Martin-Guy Richard
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 9:09 AM
To: cisco
Subject: BGP question - Multihoming
I have a tricky version for
Title: RE: BGP question - Multihoming
You can ask both of your providers to use manipulated weight to set the route preference on the ASBR's connecting to your network.
MED, Multi Exit Descriminator can be used.
Can you explain your scenario more clearly using ip form
ask your provider1 NOT to aggregate your /23 block, instead advertise it
alone, AND put more AS # in your updates to provider2 so as to make the
route(AS_path) longer for them to reach you.
hope help.
Dan.
""Martin-Guy Richard"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAI
I have a tricky version for you guys:
I am multihomed to two provider. I got a /23 from Provider1. I
announce my /23 two Provider1 and Provider2. Since my /23 comes from
Provider1, he is supposed to aggregate in in is /16 CIDR. But, I have
to announce my /23 to my other provider. Somebody to
6 matches
Mail list logo