Re: BGP split horizon rule + reflectors =??? [7:35679]

2002-02-18 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Tnx a lot Scott. > >I'm still not there. The more I think about it, the more I get confused. I >only have more questions. >You remark about the AS# cleared up some things though. Obviously the >AS-path attribute is the only means by which BGP is able to tell where a >routing update contains a loo

Re: BGP split horizon rule + reflectors =??? [7:35679]

2002-02-18 Thread Joep Hoet
Tnx a lot Scott. I'm still not there. The more I think about it, the more I get confused. I only have more questions. You remark about the AS# cleared up some things though. Obviously the AS-path attribute is the only means by which BGP is able to tell where a routing update contains a loop, that

Re: BGP split horizon rule + reflectors =??? [7:35679]

2002-02-17 Thread Scott H.
First of all, BGP has no "split horizon" rule. IBGP neighbors will not propagate routes to each other as a matter of loop protection (since we have no way to add AS numbers w/in the AS--don't worry about confederations yet). This really has nothing to do w/split horizon. Try this: R1R2---R3

BGP split horizon rule + reflectors =??? [7:35679]

2002-02-17 Thread Joep Hoet
The BGP split horizon rule is confusing me. It states that routes learned by a IBGP router are not propagated to other IBGP routers. I guess this only regards IGP learned routes and trying to avoid that an IBGP router learns a IGP route before other parts of the AS which are needed for this route