Re: BVIs, IRBs, and L3 Switching

2000-10-14 Thread Brandon J. Carroll
We use bridging quite a bit in our ADSL networks. Here is a sample. bridge irb bridge 64 protocol ieee bridge 64 route ip interface BVI1 ip address 172.64.0.254 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache interface Serial0.1 multipoint frame-relay map bridge 35 broadcast IETF

Re: BVIs, IRBs, and L3 Switching

2000-10-14 Thread Pradeep Kumar
CAn you send a visio diagram of the network in question. Do you use STP in this particular network ? -Original Message- From:Brandon J. Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Sat, 14 Oct 2000 00:02:18 -0700 (PDT) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BVIs, IRBs

Re: BVIs, IRBs, and L3 Switching

2000-10-14 Thread Brian
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Brandon J. Carroll wrote: We use bridging quite a bit in our ADSL networks. Here is a sample. bridge irb bridge 64 protocol ieee bridge 64 route ip interface BVI1 ip address 172.64.0.254 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache interface Serial0.1

BVIs, IRBs, and L3 Switching

2000-10-13 Thread Hartnell, George
I'm having some difficulty getting bridge-group routing to happen. Static routing happens just ducky between two IP addressed interfaces. IRB is enabled. Bridge group 64 (my number of the month) remains painfully silent as the packets bounce back and forth, back and forth, between a routed port

Re: BVIs, IRBs, and L3 Switching

2000-10-13 Thread Brian
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Hartnell, George wrote: I'm having some difficulty getting bridge-group routing to happen. Static routing happens just ducky between two IP addressed interfaces. IRB is enabled. Bridge group 64 (my number of the month) remains painfully silent as the packets bounce back