Re: CCIE Security [7:24209]

2001-10-26 Thread nrf
dras > > -Original Message- > From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE Security [7:24209] > > > Any specific answers to your questions would violate NDA. > > All I can tell you is thi

RE: CCIE Security [7:24209]

2001-10-25 Thread Andras Bellak
s the wrong word, but I hope I'm conveying the question a little more directly.) Andras -Original Message- From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Security [7:24209] Any specific answers to your questions wou

Re: CCIE Security [7:24209]

2001-10-25 Thread nrf
Any specific answers to your questions would violate NDA. All I can tell you is this. Anybody who is studying for the R/S (whether they passed or failed) and thinks they can make an easy transition to the Security CCIE is deluding himself. Security and R/S are significantly different. ""Nave

CCIE Security [7:24209]

2001-10-25 Thread Naveen
Dear Friends, I have following specific questions about CCIE security. I will appreciate for your time answering them, 1.What is the proportion of routing/switching and Security portions in written and lab ? 2.How deep is the knowledge of routing/switching required for CCIE security Lab. Is it