CBWFQ is easier to configure and the default q is a WFQ.
Jay Greenberg wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can anyone please explain the difference between CBWFQ and CQ? It seems
to me that they both allow you to class traffic in a custom manner, so
whats the main difference?
Jay
Ok fair enough, but from a CCIE lab exam question perspective, I'm
trying to determine when to use which technique for what type of
question. Are there certain things that each can do that the other
cannot?
On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 10:59, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
CBWFQ is easier to configure and
I haven't taken the CCIE lab yet, but first I'd think they'd want you to use
CBWFQ or LLQ, as the rest are just ancient. Cisco is emphasizing AVVID, so
you'd probably be tested on avvid technologies. I'd also study NBAR and
multicast, among others. Probably dial-peers as well.
But I guess
With custom queueing you can classify the traffic as well as give parameters
as to how many packets each queue will service before moving on the next
one. With CBWFQ, each class is treated as a WFQ so that large flows don't
choke out the smaller ones.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
4 matches
Mail list logo
