Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to
classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even
less information than before.
"TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think of as a sufficient study guide.
___
UPDATED Posting G
Don't you just love the new exam outline? Looks like they gave up the sushi
at those meetings and just went with the tequila... [=`)
Dale
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to
classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even
less information than before.
"TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think
. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
>
>
> Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to
> classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The ne
x27;t you just love the new exam outline? Looks like they gave up the
sushi
> at those meetings and just went with the tequila... [=`)
>
> Dale
>
> >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
The latest version (2.1) of Cisco's Networking Academy curriculum still teaches
classful addressing. It does however now mention VLSM for the first time as an
advanced topic. This curriculum was released around Jan/Feb this year. My
guess would be that at the CCNA level you would still assume c
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 8:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
doesn't 12.0 default to classless?
> I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip
> classless," we should assume classfu
7 matches
Mail list logo
