RE: CEF or round robin

2001-01-21 Thread Steve Smith
Changed back to CEF and it is balanced on packets sent and received withing 20 or so. Seem good to me. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 5:31 PM To: Steve Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CEF or round robin So what was

Re: CEF or round robin

2001-01-20 Thread Jason A. Diegmueller
> Two T1's going to the same ISP? Why not use PPP and make one big pipe? I > like simple answers. > > Check your port/speed/duplex settings on the new switch. Many times ISPs won't do PPP multilink due to the overhead it introduces. I've found CEF per-packet to meet my company's needs. We ha

Re: CEF or round robin

2001-01-19 Thread Michael Snyder
ally across two paths. > > ( Cisco press book Network Design and Case Studies ) > ( BTW anyone else think this book is not all that good? ) > > HTH > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Steve Smith &

RE: CEF or round robin

2001-01-19 Thread Chuck Larrieu
lse think this book is not all that good? ) HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:CEF or round robin OK gang I need to opinions. We s

CEF or round robin

2001-01-19 Thread Steve Smith
OK gang I need to opinions. We set up 2 point-to-point Ts to a client running CEF. Everything seemed to work fine, speed was good, packets per T was about equal. Then we had a switch go bad. We replaced it but still had a sluggish network. Some of our techs came in from another office and togethe