Should the very first thing that you should do in this case is to check what
ports they are attempting to connected to in reverse direction ?


""Ken Yeo""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> More info on this:
>
> When we by pass PIX (plus in a laptop to a hub between PIX and Internet
> router). We CAN browse www.sitemeter.com.
>
> Behind PIX, we can ping www.sitemeter.com and get 100% reply from
> 216.167.17.2. But we CANNOT browse using IE.
>
> Route is going to the correct gateway, do not have 216.167.17 in our WAN.
>
> So HTTP/application layer coming from the site is definately blocked in
the
> PIX.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ken Yeo
> Network Engineer
> Aurum Technology
> CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, CNE
>
> ""Ken Yeo""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are having problem to browse this website:
> >
> > www.sitemeter.com
> >
> > Internet explorer will say "Opening page http://www.sitemeter.com"; in
the
> > status bar on the bottom and the page never came up. It came back with
> > error:
> >
> > The page cannot be displayed
> > We are able to browse the site using dialup to Netzero and some other
dial
> > up ISP.
> > I wonder those of you who use PIX try this site?
> > Our first thought was reserve DNS was not setup so we setup reserve DNS
> for
> > the NATed IP on the PIX, but still cannot browse the site. Any ideas?
> > Thanks,
> > Ken Yeo
> > Network Engineer,
> > Aurum Technology
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2431&t=2431
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to