Catalyst 2926 and 2901 Sup Versions

2001-03-06 Thread Mark Holloway
I researched the archives and saw a conflict. Anyone mind advising? Catalyst 2901 = Sup I Catalyst 2926T = Sup ? (I or II) Regards, Mark _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclos

Re: Catalyst 2926 and 2901 Sup Versions

2001-03-06 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi, I think what this is saying is that the 2901 can only use a supervisor I and the 2926T can use either a SUP I or II Just a thought. Teunis Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Tuesday, March 06, 2001 at 09:25:33 AM, Mark Holloway wrote: > I researched the archives and saw a conflict. Anyone m

Re: Catalyst 2926 and 2901 Sup Versions

2001-03-06 Thread Circusnuts
p; real world applications requiring a Catalyst type product would seek to use neither a Sup1 or 2. .02 Phil - Original Message - From: "Tony van Ree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, Ma

Re: Catalyst 2926 and 2901 Sup Versions [7:3366]

2001-05-06 Thread Brian
I believe 2926T is SupII, since it supports FEC (unlike the Sup1/2901) Brian On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Mark Holloway wrote: > I researched the archives and saw a conflict. Anyone mind advising? > > > Catalyst 2901 = Sup I > > Catalyst 2926T = Sup ? (I or II) > > > Regards, > Mark -