Re: Catalyst 6500 vs 7200 VXR [7:62892]

2003-02-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oene" @groupstudy.com em 12/02/2003 18:44:23 Favor responder a "Peter van Oene" Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto: Re: Catalyst 6500 vs 7200 VXR [7:62892] At 06:37 PM 2/12/2003 +, Brett Johnson wrote: >What benefits can a Catalyst 650

Re: Catalyst 6500 vs 7200 VXR [7:62892]

2003-02-12 Thread Peter van Oene
At 06:37 PM 2/12/2003 +, Brett Johnson wrote: >What benefits can a Catalyst 6500 switch provide that a 7200 router cannot? >Are the FLEXWAN modules a reliable product or is it better to separate your >WAN traffic devices from you LAN devices? What about the performance of the >FLEXWAN modules?

Re: Catalyst 6500 vs 7200 VXR [7:62892]

2003-02-12 Thread Larry Letterman
al Message - From: "MADMAN" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: Re: Catalyst 6500 vs 7200 VXR [7:62892] > Brett Johnson wrote: > > What benefits can a Catalyst 6500 switch provide that a 7200 router cannot? > >The 6500 is also a switch. >

Re: Catalyst 6500 vs 7200 VXR [7:62892]

2003-02-12 Thread MADMAN
Brett Johnson wrote: > What benefits can a Catalyst 6500 switch provide that a 7200 router cannot? The 6500 is also a switch. > Are the FLEXWAN modules a reliable product or is it better to separate your > WAN traffic devices from you LAN devices? They work well though some would rather k

Catalyst 6500 vs 7200 VXR [7:62892]

2003-02-12 Thread Brett Johnson
What benefits can a Catalyst 6500 switch provide that a 7200 router cannot? Are the FLEXWAN modules a reliable product or is it better to separate your WAN traffic devices from you LAN devices? What about the performance of the FLEXWAN modules? I am just trying to understand if money is no object