Yes, you can [and should] do that [put static cam entry on the trunk ports of sw2]. In fact, if you add an _additional_ firewall--> or for better redundancy Dear Group, > > Need your help in setting up the following :- > > SETUP :- There are 2 core switches SW1 & Sw2 (connected back to back > with both > the SUP GE ports Fiber uplink (Channeld and trunk). On one of the > switch (SW1) > I have 2 firewalls connected in cluster mode. For this clustered > firewall I have bind the multicast mac address on the switch SW1 as > the recommended method by the firewall vendor by the command (set cam > permanent ). > > Now the problem faced here is since they have only bind the mac > address to 2 ports on SW1 (switch one ONLY) there seems to be some > multicast packets flooding on my second core switch SW2 for that > multicast address. > > The customer wants to stop this broadcast from hapening on 2nd switch > SW2 and hence wants to bind the same multicast mac address on the 2nd > Switch with the trunk ports going to SW1 from SW2. > > Has anybody faced similar situation ?? Is this configuration > supported. Can I bind the cam entry to my trunk port on the SW2 as > well with the same multicast > mac address?? > > Many thanks in advance. > > Thanks > Hitesh >>snip of huge disclaimer<<
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60493&t=60493 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
