RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Best of luck to you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065] Dear Kris, Karago, Pierre-Alex, Chuck, Steven, Brian and everybody thanks

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-27 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh
o the router terminal. Ismail Al-shelh -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065] considering his WAN links are point to point HDLC, I don't see how he even got t

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Kris Keen
id use static routes, get rid of eigrp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45112&t=45065 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violat

Re: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
Correctioin on Subnet Mask /30 = 255.255.255.252 (Not .250) so Here is correct Sbnet Mask Info: Hers is what I would do with a /30 subnet: RtrA s0 -192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.0/30-link)RrB s0 192.168.0.2 For Router A to B I would use /30 subnet instead of using all /24 Here is how: inte

Re: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
Hers is what I would do with a /30 subnet: RtrA s0 -192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.0/30-link)RrB s0 192.168.0.2 For Router A to B I would use /30 subnet instead of using all /24 Here is how: interface Serial0 > ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.250 (/30) (this way u hv 4 Addresses, but u c

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 3:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065] Hi all Yesterday I configured three sites connected through leased line 64 Kbps , the first router A located in the head quarter, the second one

Re: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Chuck
considering his WAN links are point to point HDLC, I don't see how he even got the IP's to take. Can't configure two different physical interfaces into the same subnet. Technical exception - unnumbered. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The onl

Re: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Steven A. Ridder
The only problem I see is that both of your wan links are in 1 giant network. I'd change that. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Ismail Al-Shelh"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all > > Yesterday I configured three sites connected through leased line 64 Kbps , >

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Brian Hill
Ismail, I hate to be the devil's advocate, but why are you even using a routing protocol if you don't have any redundant links? Brian Hill CCNP, CCDP, MCSE 2000 (Charter Member),MCSE+I (NT4.0), MCSA (Charter Member), MCP+I, MCP(21), Inet+, Net+, A+ Lead Technology Architect, TechTrain Author: C

Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh
Hi all Yesterday I configured three sites connected through leased line 64 Kbps , the first router A located in the head quarter, the second one B located in the first branche and the third router C located in the second Branch. Simple Diagram Router(A) ---Router(B) | |