Does anybody know the major differences between these two firewall
solutions? In this particular situation performance is not an issue. Is a
properly configured router using IOS firewall any less secure than using a
PIX?
Regards,
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=
). Meaning a hacker cannot
spoof as a continuing TCP session. Also- the PIX is not vulnerable to
anything NTP, because network time has been removed with this device.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Sam
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: Cisco IOS Firewall vc Cisco
On 0, Sam wrote:
> Does anybody know the major differences between these two firewall
> solutions? In this particular situation performance is not an issue. Is a
> properly configured router using IOS firewall any less secure than using a
> PIX?
>
>
The Cisco PIX firewall performs stateful
Ok, then what CBAC is doing and how would you compare CBAC and a Pix ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Subba Rao
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Firewall vc Cisco PIX Firewall [7:8200]
On
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Firewall vc Cisco PIX Firewall [7:8200]
On 0, Sam wrote:
> Does anybody know the major differences between these two firewall
> solutions? In this particular situation performance is not an issue. Is
a
> properly configured router using IOS firew
5 matches
Mail list logo