Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command compare with
access-list/access-group command in PIX?.
I heard that the static conduit will no longer available in the future realease. Is it
True??.
Thanks.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscri
ECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command
compare with
access-list/access-group command in PIX?.
I heard that the s
ess, but its a nice feature.
>
>
> HTH
>
> Nabil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit
-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
> >
> >
> > Does anybody kn
TECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
That's true, conduits are going away. The only reason you see them is for
backward compatibility issues. Definitely use static commands with
access-lists. Its a two-step process, but its a nice feature.
HTH
Nabil
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command
compare with
access-list/access-gro
6 matches
Mail list logo
