Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access Control
for Windows NT/2000? Are there any gottchas that I need to be aware of? I am
trying to get approval to purchase this product but managment wants me to
get opinions from someone else besides Cisco.
Thanks,
Harles
Me
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7).
But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service
on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't
check it, though).
Arthur Davis
CCIE #6430
Message Posted at:
http://www
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7).
But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service
on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't
check it, though).
Arthur Davis
CCIE #6430
Message Posted at:
http://www
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7).
But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service
on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't
check it, though).
Arthur Davis
CCIE #6430
Message Posted at:
http://www
]
Subject: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access Control
for Windows NT/2000? Are there any gottchas that I need to be aware of? I am
trying to get approval to purchase this product but managment wants me to
get opinions from
Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things.
The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very well.
""Stepp Harless"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access
uot;Chris Clark"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
>Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:53:29 -0400
>
>Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things.
>The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very we
, 2001 8:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
So far the password changing issue is really the only limitation of ACS that
we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same database that your
desktops login to (ADS for example) then
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 8:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
>
>
> So far the password changing issue is really the only
> limitation of ACS that
> we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same
9 matches
Mail list logo
