I wish I could turn my high school English teacher loose on the CCNP support
exam.
The writing was worse than dreadful. Has anyone else noticed this?
I passed with plenty to spare, so this is not sour grapes.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56237&t=56237
-
I found the same with the BCMSN exam, the wording
for certain questions could have been written a little
less ambiguous
neo
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56273&t=56237
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
I couldn't agree with you more, I failed by six points (guess I need more
quality studying time). Some questions had me asking what are they asking
here "the meaning of life".
Not that I'm sour grapes but yes the wording is very vague at best.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/re
I thought the routing exam was the worst offender for ambiguity.
CIT a close second.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Dreadful writing on CCNP support exam. [7:56237
00210271331.NAA16123@;groupstudy.com...
I thought the routing exam was the worst offender for ambiguity.
CIT a close second.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Dreadful writing on C
At 1:31 PM + 10/27/02, Joshua Barnes wrote:
>I thought the routing exam was the worst offender for ambiguity.
>CIT a close second.
The ultimate ambiguity would be if you couldn't decide which of the
two was worse.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56384
--
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:hcb@;gettcomm.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Dreadful writing on CCNP support exam. [7:56237]
At 1:31 PM + 10/27/02, Joshua Barnes wrote:
>I thought the routing exam was the worst offender for ambiguity.
-Original Message-
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:hcb@;gettcomm.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Dreadful writing on CCNP support exam. [7:56237]
>
>
> At 1:31 PM + 10/27/02, Joshua Barnes wrote:
> &g
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Dreadful writing on CCNP support exam. [7:56237]
I haven't taken any Cisco exams lately so can't comment on the wording, but
to be honest trying to figure out which answer is "less wrong" sounds like a
lot of my day to day work...
JMcL
Roberts, Larry
9 matches
Mail list logo
