Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-17 Thread Robert Padjen
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058] I don't know about a hard limit but me thinks you'll hit the practical limit first anyway:) Is this an acedemic question??? Dave Robertson, Douglas wrote: Does anyone know of limitation

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-16 Thread Robertson, Douglas
-Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058] I don't know about a hard limit but me thinks you'll hit the practical limit first anyway:) Is this an acedemic question

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-16 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Of Robertson, Douglas Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058] This is actually for a practical issue, I have a customer that wants to implement +-400 remote sites connected with redundancy to two core routers. Each router will have

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-16 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058] I don't know about a hard limit but me thinks you'll hit the practical limit first anyway:) Is this an acedemic question??? Dave Robertson, Douglas wrote: Does

Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-16 Thread MADMAN
Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058] I don't know about a hard limit but me thinks you'll hit the practical limit first anyway:) Is this an acedemic question

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-16 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Thanks to all for the very good information Doug -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058] This is actually for a practical issue, I have

EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-15 Thread Robertson, Douglas
Does anyone know of limitation in the amount of EIGRP neighbors on a router. If there is, is this a limitation per physical interface or a limitation per router. I found a document on CCO a couple of months ago that mentioned these limits but I have now searched and searched but cannot find that

Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-15 Thread MADMAN
I don't know about a hard limit but me thinks you'll hit the practical limit first anyway:) Is this an acedemic question??? Dave Robertson, Douglas wrote: Does anyone know of limitation in the amount of EIGRP neighbors on a router. If there is, is this a limitation per physical

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-15 Thread tu do
Douglas, The Switching 640-504 course material from Cisco press says the limitations peer neighbor routers for OSPF and EIGRP is 50. I also read that from cisco doc in the section talk about Dual Core. Cheer, Tu Do. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32096t=32058

RE: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-15 Thread tu do
Douglas, I donot have books with me now, sorry cannot tell you the pages# to search. I took switching exam at begining of this month and remember about it. The limitation (50) is for the protocol characteristics, not for the interface or the router. Cheer, Message Posted at:

Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]

2002-01-15 Thread Steven A. Ridder
There is no physical limitation to the number of neighbors in either protocol. Cisco does recommend 50, but you can do 60 or higher. the limit is your router's performance. tu do wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Douglas, I donot have books with me now, sorry