es, Bob; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Excessive Retransmissions UPDATE [7:2553]
thanks for sharing and updating us. Just a few questions if you'd
indulge me, otherwise have a great day.
I'm kind of curious and very clueless since I don't know your network
architecture, but if you have a
Just wanted to update the list on this matter because I feel that it could
very easily happen to anyone of you and it was very difficult to locate the
problem. Got to blame this one on Big Blue hardware. Yes, the AS400 was the
cause of all our problems here, once again. Apparently several days pri
Thanks for the update. Was it really a broadcast storm? It sounds like it
was excessive retransmissions, which certainly could happen if static
routes were removed. Clients trying to reach servers across the AS400
(which presumably does routing) would just keep trying and trying. But the
frame
t storm level, do you know why your routers were not
picking those up and routing them for the host? In other words, was ARP
working at the host and router level?
-e-
- Original Message -
From: "Sites, Bob"
To:
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:58 AM
Subject: Excessive Retra
Have you considered DLSW+ for the IBM traffic?
Rob H.
CCNP, CCDP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2841&t=2553
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduc
he conditions.
-e-
- Original Message -
From: Sites, Bob ;
To: ;
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: RE: Excessive Retransmissions UPDATE [7:2553]
>
> Our AS400 does have multiple NIC's. Two ether and two token. The biggest
> problem we could see on our sniffer
rkstations to the AS400. I know very little about the IBM world so
>if
> > you could enlighten me as to why the IBM box seemed to get confused, I
>would
> > love to pass it on to it's sysadmins? BobS
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: EA Louie
> > S
7 matches
Mail list logo
