As an FYI, NAT takes up about 160 bytes per translation. Check out this link
for more info.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/iofwft/prodlit/iosnt_qp.htm
Thanx,
Mark Baker
CCNP looking for a job
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Ramsey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NAT on a 1601 router [7:15027]
PAT is not advisable on a 1601 for a large company... Even with NAT timeouts
and such, you have to remember that each PAT/NAT connection takes up
memory. If you have a lot of people being assigned a dynamic translation,
that's and entry into the router's memory. So keep and eye on the memory
consumption and utilization. If you encounter sporadic lockups and/or
reboots for no apparent reason, chances are memory is the culprit.
-Patrick
>>> "Circusnuts" 08/06/01 01:06PM >>>
Sure- I believe it only requires basic IP IOS. NAT was first introduced in
11.2 & I believe PAT (NAT overload) came about in 11.3's.
All the best !!!
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Picciani Francesco Saverio"
To:
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:34 AM
Subject: NAT on a 1601 router [7:15027]
> Is possible implement access-lists and NAT features on a router Cisco
1601?
>
> Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15048&t=15027
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
