: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
I'm confused. My remote site LMI type is Cisco, HQ is ANSI.
I am passing
LMI and the site is up, just slow. If my LMI type was
mismatched, wouldn't
it not work at all? I cleared
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
I don't know what *should* happen, however I can confirm (from personal
experience) it is possible to have a somewhat working link with
mismatched lmi type.
If all the remote sites have cisco and HQ is ANSI I'd change
HQ
, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
I'm confused. My remote site LMI type is Cisco, HQ is ANSI.
I am passing
LMI and the site is up, just slow. If my LMI type was
mismatched
We have a frame relay network with some sites complaining about slowness
issues. Everyone is blaming the bandwidth without testing. Is there anyway
I can prove what is causing the latency? Here are some outputs from the
remote site router. Can someone help me decipher?
Thanks,
Rob Provost
by it.
-Original Message-
From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
We have a frame relay network with some sites complaining
about slowness
issues
..your bandwidth is low
1 packet per second is NOTHING...but you are getting way to many CRC ,
Ignored,Input Errors
please let US know about the other end...
CU
steve
From: Provost, Robert
Reply-To: Provost, Robert
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized
Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF
-Original Message-
From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:52 AM
To: 'Provost, Robert'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
Importance: High
send me sh int
clear counters before
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
Endorsed by it.
-Original Message-
From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
Here is the sh int
Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
auh--
u have a big setup..
most of the frame relay problem happens of remote site pushing too much data
that the central site can handle
u r using
ay, July 30, 2001 10:52 AM
To: 'Provost, Robert'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
Importance: High
send me sh int
clear counters before sending and wait for 5 min to get new stats
your router is not receiving lmi packets properly
cables. CRC's are most often a layer one issue.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
Here is the sh int after cleared counters and 5
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
Endorsed by it.
-Original Message-
From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
I'm confused. My
12 matches
Mail list logo
