Actually, I am talking about full routes from two providers... I'm just wanting to verify my knowledge (which is typically based on what I've seen here previously).
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Neiberger" To: ; Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:53 PM Subject: Re: Hardware requirements for actual BGP implementation [7:46053] > If you aren't taking full routes from two providers, I believe that a > 2650 with 128MB would be fine. A 2620 or lower would not be the > greatest choice. If you want to take full routes from two or more > providers, you will need at least 256MB of DRAM which forces you to pick > a different platform, like a 3600 or 7200, or perhaps even one of the > new 3700 routers. Can they take 256MB? > > > >>> "Leigh Anne Chisholm" 6/7/02 1:36:10 PM >>> > I'm giving a BGP presentation next week and I just want to update > myself on > some items... > > Last I recall, the minimum amount of memory required to run BGP is 128 > MB > however 256 MB is recommended. Is this information still correct? > > Can a 2600 run BGP? Not that you'd want to see that, but is anyone > doing > it? What's the minimum Cisco platform recommended for running an > actual BGP > implementation? > > Thanks in advance... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46058&t=46058 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
