Hardware flaws hang some Cisco firewalls
Failures don't threaten security, but could cause network availability
headaches    
  
 
Stephen Lawson, SAN FRANCISCO
Hardware flaws in some Cisco Systems firewalls for corporate central and
branch offices have caused the systems to hang or shut themselves down
and forced Cisco to replace the affected boxes. 

Some Cisco Pix 515, 515-DC and 506 Firewalls have suffered system hangs
when traffic on the network becomes too heavy, requiring IS staff to
manually restart the firewall, Cisco reported in an October 18 field
notice on its website. Cisco expects the problem to occur most often in
the 515 models, which are designed for corporate central offices, but
said it may also happen in 506 units in some cases. The 506 is designed
for branch offices, which tend to experience lower traffic levels.

The firewalls typically are installed between a company's internal
network and the internet to guard against intrusion. The flaws can cut
off an internet connection that runs through a firewall but will not
cause a connection to become insecure, Cisco said on its website.
Officials at the company weren't available to comment in detail about
the problem.

While the failures don't pose a security issue, they could cause network
availability headaches for a number of large corporations. Cisco holds
about one quarter of the overall firewall market, according to Richard
Stiennon, a Gartner analyst in Detroit. A serious hardware flaw in such
a widely sold firewall device is probably unprecedented, Stiennon says.

Cisco has traced the source of the problem to a component that the
networking giant began buying from a new supplier in May. The
component's timing is slightly different from that on previous units,
and the difference makes the system unstable, according to the field
notice. Units made after October 2 don't have the flaw. 

Cisco is replacing the firewalls for registered customers, free of
charge. However, because the replacement units need to come from the
company's manufacturing facilities in California instead of stock in
local service centres, service agreements for overnight replacement
can't necessarily be met, especially outside the US. 

The only workaround Cisco offers is to reduce the traffic load by
hard-coding all the firewall's interfaces to 10Mbit/s, or making a
change elsewhere in the network that reduces traffic to that level. The
units most often hang when traffic exceeds 15Mbit/s, though the
threshold varies, according to Cisco. The devices are available with
10Mbit/s, 100Mbit/s, or 1Gbit/s interfaces. 

Few enterprises are equipped to deal with a workaround that would
throttle down a critical network connection so dramatically, Gartner's
Stiennon says. On the bright side, only a small percentage have internet
connections of more than 10Mbit/s, he adds.

Cisco also reported on October 18 a flaw in the way power supplies are
attached to motherboards in some Pix 506 Firewalls. Over time, friction
and vibration can work the power connection loose, causing the firewall
to freeze or reboot, according to the field notice. A cable tie-down was
introduced on October 2 that will keep the power supply attached.

Cisco is replacing the affected 506 units for registered customers, free
of charge. As a workaround, Cisco provides instructions on its website
for opening the firewall and reinserting the power connector in the
motherboard. 

The failures and possible long waits for replacements put the spotlight
on one problem with integrated hardware-software "appliances" such as
the Pix Firewalls, Stiennon says. If hardware problems befall a software
firewall, such as one from Check Point Software Technologies, most users
can solve them easily and quickly by replacing the Intel-based PC on
which the software runs.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24717&t=24717
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to