I agree with the other post... if you don't want 1 and 5 to access each other, then what's the point of having them in the same VLAN?
Mike W. "Winston Shaw" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy. > Try setting port security commands or setting cam filter commands. If it > takes these commands you are in business. Be careful of how you use them > though. Using MAC addresses for security can cause problems like shutting > ports down when the unwanted MAC tries to cross the port threshold. > > Winston V. Shaw > CCIE(#7991) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from > [7:49410] > > > I have a customer who needs to have several ports on a 2924XL-EN in the same > VLAN. The customer does not want these ports to be able to communicate with > one another, but would like all of them to be able to go to/through another > port. E.g., ports 1 to 5 would be on VLAN 50, they'd all be able to access > port 6, on VLAN 60, but not each other. > > > > I did find something on CCO about Private VLANs, but I see that the 2924 is > not on the list of hardware that supports PVLAN's. Does anyone know of a > way > to accomplish this segregation within the same VLAN, short of PVLAN's? Any > help is much appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Don Claybrook Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49489&t=49489 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
