hat differentiates it from OSPF. It doesn't make
sense why they wouldn't abandon the idea of distance vector and just call it
link-state.
Thanks in Advance,
Fred
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EM
but
you will find quite a few routing researchers arguing link state
versus distance vector.
>
>Thanks in Advance,
>Fred
>
>
>>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
> Thanks for the response Howard.
>
> >It's an "urban legend" that classful vs. classless has ANYTHING to do
> >with something being link state or distance vector. It's a
> >historical accident that the first dynamic routing protocols,
> >developed when there was no such thing as classless
I expect there to be many excellent responses to this, but I'll start off
with a mediocre one. :-)
Distance vector and link state routing protocols primarily differ in three
ways: how they notify their neighbors of the routes they know about, how
they go about building their own routing table ou
"Hybrid" routing protocol is a marketing term, not a technical one,
which is an attempt to differentiate EIGRP from older distance
vector, and standards-based link state, protocols.
EIGRP uses the Diffusing Update algorithm invented by JJ
Garcia-Luna-Aceves while he was at Stanford Research In
Hi
I just a general question about routing protocols, if anyone could help
me out here I'd be grateful.
When comparing EIGRP to Distance Vector routing protocols, like RIP,
the only similarity that I noticed was that the network statements are both
classful. Is this the only characte
6 matches
Mail list logo
