I did this lab earlier today and was wondering the same thing. If i remember correctly router B did not have a network statement to advertise the link that exists between B and C. If you add that statement router A then learns about the link thru IBGP and can find the path back to C when you ping from C to A. HTH. Ed ""Sean C."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group, > > Trying to do some IBGP from Doyle II and from Hutnik's All-in-1-Lab 2nd > edition. I know I'm doing something wrong - just can't figure out the > issue. I'll use Hutnik's stuff - from lab #48 - page 533: > > > AS 100 | AS 200 > | > RtrA-S0-------------------S0-RtrB-E0-------------E0-RtrC > S0 192.1.1.1/24 | S0 192.1.1.2/24 E0 > 193.1.1.2/24 > L0 1.1.1.1/24 | E0 193.1.1.1/24 > | L0 2.2.2.2/24 > AS 100 | AS 200 AS > 200 > > > Basically, RouterA is in AS 100 connected via S0 to RouterB (AS 200) on > RouterB's S0 and using BGP. RouterB and RouterC are connected Ethernet and > using IBGP for AS 200. I'm trying to get Router C to be able to hit > RouterA's ints. I'm doing the basics of no sync on Router C and B and also > having Router B announcing itself as next-hop-self. I've also cleared ip > bgp * on router B and C. Still no-go. I can hit RtrA from RtrB S0 > interface but not from RtrB's E0 interface using an extended ping. So what > is wrong with Router B? What am I missing? > > Router A's config: > ! > hostname RouterA > ! > interface Loopback0 > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > clockrate 4000000 > ! > router bgp 100 > network 1.0.0.0 > neighbor 192.1.1.2 remote-as 200 > ! > > =========================== > Router B's config: > ! > hostname RouterB > ! > interface Loopback0 > ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address 193.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Serial0/0 > ip address 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > router bgp 200 > no synchronization > neighbor 192.1.1.1 remote-as 100 > neighbor 193.1.1.2 remote-as 200 > neighbor 193.1.1.2 next-hop-self > ! > > > RouterB#sh ip bgp > BGP table version is 2, local router ID is 2.2.2.2 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - > internal > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path > *> 1.0.0.0 192.1.1.1 0 0 100 i > > RouterB#sh ip rout > B 1.0.0.0/8 [20/0] via 192.1.1.1, 00:34:47 > 2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets > C 2.2.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 > C 193.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0 > C 192.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0 > > ========================== > Router C's config: > ! > hostname RouterC > ! > interface Loopback0 > ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 193.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > router bgp 200 > no synchronization > neighbor 193.1.1.1 remote-as 200 > > > RouterC#sh ip bgp > BGP table version is 2, local router ID is 3.3.3.3 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - > internal > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path > *>i1.0.0.0 193.1.1.1 0 100 0 100 i > > RouterC#sh ip rout > B 1.0.0.0/8 [200/0] via 193.1.1.1, 00:30:21 > 3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets > C 3.3.3.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 > C 193.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > > > Like I wrote at the top, this is just for my lab setup. Thanks in advance!! > Sean > > CCNP, CCDP, MCSE > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8649&t=8649 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]