veryone!
God Bless America!
>>>Brian
>From: "Morgan Hansen"
>To: "'Brian Lodwick'"
>Subject: RE: IETF encapsulation [7:48044]
>Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 01:39:51 +0200
>
>Hmm... Well? I belive you, no question there! Id trust you with my l
Cisco.
>>>Brian
>From: "Morgan Hansen"
>Reply-To: "Morgan Hansen"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: IETF encapsulation [7:48044]
>Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 21:03:51 GMT
>
>Hi.
>
>Mmm... Reading in Wendel Odoms 640-607 studying book here it says:
Cisco is the default.
""Morgan Hansen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi.
>
> Mmm... Reading in Wendel Odoms 640-607 studying book here it says:
>
> "For example, if one router is not a Cisco router and does not support
> Cisco encapsulation, IETF encapsulation
Hi.
Mmm... Reading in Wendel Odoms 640-607 studying book here it says:
"For example, if one router is not a Cisco router and does not support
Cisco encapsulation, IETF encapsulation is required".
But, what im wondering is:
Isnt IETF the default encapsulation method for Frame Relay on Cisco
4 matches
Mail list logo