RE: IP Classless Revisited (More info)

2001-03-26 Thread John Neiberger
Duluth, GA 30097-1511 = -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:32 PM To: Vincent Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IP Classless Revisited (Mor

RE: IP Classless Revisited (More info)

2001-03-26 Thread Bob Vance
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:32 PM To: Vincent Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IP Classless Revisited (More info) Metric shouldn't have anything to do with it. Whether I'm using RIP or OSPF

Re: IP Classless Revisited (More info)

2001-03-25 Thread John Neiberger
Metric shouldn't have anything to do with it. Whether I'm using RIP or OSPF the default route is being added to the routing table of the hub router. The issue is that with no ip classless configured, the hub router should NOT ever pick the default route when trying to reach unknown subnets of th

Re: IP Classless Revisited (More info)

2001-03-25 Thread Vincent
I guess in faovour of metric. "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Okay, I just tried this with RIP advertising the default route and I'm even > more confused! Now, it behaves as I would expect. With no ip classless, > pings to unknown 1

RE: IP Classless Revisited (More info)

2001-03-25 Thread John Neiberger
Okay, I just tried this with RIP advertising the default route and I'm even more confused! Now, it behaves as I would expect. With no ip classless, pings to unknown 10.x.x.x subnets are unroutable even though there is a default route in the routing table. With no ip classless, why does my route